View Single Post
Eski 23-05-2013, 04:29   #1496
antihistaminik
Ağaç Dostu
 
Giriş Tarihi: 29-06-2012
Şehir: istanbul
Mesajlar: 323
Alıntı:
Orijinal Mesaj Sahibi Selçuk Boz Mesajı Göster
......internette bir şey araştırma olayında yeterli değilim. Malumunuz, internet deniz derya bir ortam.

Yine samimiyetle istirham ederim ki, EM ile ilgili olarak elinizde bilimsel araştırmalar varsa, lütfen burada paylaşın ve bizi bilgilendirin.
.......
sevgili safranlı sn dogasever, Selçuk Bey'e fazla yuklenmeyiniz lutfen ...

dedigi gibi internet derya ve EM hakkinda hem pozitif hem negatif yorumlar daha dogrusu bilimsel calismalar var.. biraz arastirinca dahi ulasabiliyorsunuz..bu durumda da kafa karismasi cok dogal..

kisa bir arastirmada dahi soyle bilgilere ulasilabiliyor;

Sri Lanka da yapilan, yabani otlarin ilk yilda olmasa da sonraki yillarda EM uygulamasi ile azaldigina dair bir bilimsel calisma:

http://www.livingsoil.co.uk/learning...s%26Tomato.pdf

Yeni Zelanda da yapilan EM-Bokashi uygulamasinin misir yetistiriciligindeki pozitif etkilerini goz onune koyan bilimsel calisma:

http://www.merfield.com/research/200...ew-zealand.pdf

bu iki pozitif 'case study' den sonra bu tip bilimsel calismalarin gecerliligini sorgulayan Hollanda menseyli "Effective Microorganisms: Myth or reality?" meali :
"Etkin Mikroorganizmalar: Şehir efsanesi mi Gerçek mi ?" isimli bilimsel calisma:

http://www.scielo.org.pe/pdf/rpb/v14n2/a26v14n02

buradan bir kaç paragraf ... carpici (ceviri yapamayacagim istenirse sonra yaparim..) :

"From all the bibliography compiled, most of it did not make a serious analysis of the effects of EM in soil health and its benefits. Many mistakes in the set up of the experiments were found and in some no statistical analysis was performed at all. A valid research done at Wageningen University showed that EM was not effective, at least under conditions in The Netherlands."

"There are known principles in the ecology of the soils that reject straight forward the effectiveness of the EM: principally the effect of EM in the soil is difficult to achieve since the amount of microorganisms added by the EM solution in comparison with the amount of microorganisms in the soil (about 10exp9)=(10 üzeri 9) is insignificant and no effects can be expected."

"There are important social and economic implications. From the serious research done in Wageningen University for the dutch conditions a main conclusion can be obtained: EM is not worthy to use."

"Conclusions:

1. There is a great amount of non-reliable information about EM. This information is always positive about the effectiveness of EM with a clear business oriented targets.
2. Educate the society towards a critical way of thinking when choosing a product to use. Having on mind that there is no magic product that solves their problems.
3. Due to the fact that there could be a beneficial effect of EM
in tropical countries (where research has been carried out with satisfactory results although no reliable and testable data have been published) and unexpected findings with potential benefits have been found, more research is needed."


çık içinden çikabilirsen...

ben bu konuda taraf olabilecek bilgiye-tecrubeye kesinlikle sahip degilim.. sadece forumun amaca hizmet etmesi ve tarafsiz bilgilendirmelerin, tartismalarin önünün kesilmemesi taraftariyim...

saygilar...


Düzenleyen antihistaminik : 23-05-2013 saat 05:00
antihistaminik Çevrimdışı   Alıntı Yaparak Cevapla Başa Dön